Xiongnu (Hsiung-nu)-Han Dynasty War and Diplomacy, 133 BCE-150 CE
*Han Wudi (r. 141-87 BCE) the Consolidator and Warrior
Han Wudi’s decision to fight Xiongnu
Practical motives
Perceived failure of “Peace and Kinship” relations
Raiding
Ideological motives
Loss of face to “Barbarians”
Expansion of tax base
Eliminated Power of Kingdoms in east
Wudi’s methods
Financial demands
New inheritance rules
Partible inheritance
Monopolies
Iron
Salt
Liquor
Failed Diplomacy
*Zhang Qian’s mission to Yuezhi, 138-128 BCE
Northern Campaigns
*Ordos Captured, 124 BCE
Mongolia campaign, 119 BCE
Xiongnu strategic retreat
Western Campaigns and Chinese Settlement of Eastern Silk Road
*Gansu (Hexi) Captured, 121-119, 111 BCE
Zhang Qian’s failed mission to Wusun, 116 BCE
Colonization by over 1 million, 115-72 BCE
Dayuan [Ferghana] campaign, 103 BCE
Xiongnu Crisis
Discontent of subordinate tribes
Lost grazing land
Lost tribute
Civil wars over succession, 60-55 BCE
Northern and Southern Xiongnu split, 54 BCE
Tributary relations, 54 BCE
Han Emperor Xuan, r. 74-49 BCE
1) S. Xiongnu prince as Han hostage
2) S. Xiongnu pay homage
3) S. Xiongnu give tribute
4) Han emperor gives gifts
Unwritten mutual benefits
Military alliance against N. Xiongnu
Increased trade
State-level trade relations
Trans-ecological
comparative advantage
Chinese imports
Livestock
Especially war horses
Military importance
Xiongnu imports
Silk
Gold ornaments
Designed to suit Xiongnu taste
Political importance?
Embroidered Silk
Xiongnu grave
N. Mongolia
1st Century CE
Unintended Consequences
Increased interaction in borderlands
Han Wudi’s settlers in Northern Ordos, Gansu and Tarim Basin (Xinjiang)
Some S. Xiongnu in Han armies as cavalry
Shanyu Bi’s move closer to Han, 47 CE
40-50,000 warriors and families
Settlement of Chinese oases in Gansu
Han settlers
Evidence of Painted bricks in Gansu
3rd-to-5th-c. tombs
Discussion: Hansen 13-24, 30-34 (docs. 3-5)
1. What was the purpose of Zhang Qian’s diplomatic mission?
2. What is the context of the Xuanquan documents (pp. 14-18)?
3. What is the context of document 5? How accurate was Han Chinese knowledge of the Roman Empire, based on document 5?